Let's get one thing straight—I wasn't exactly a fan of WICKED (2024). If it hadn't been for a digital screener of the sequel, WICKED: FOR GOOD, landing in my inbox, I’d probably have passed on this whole two-part adaptation of the Broadway musical. For clarity, this musical draws loosely from Gregory Maguire’s book, Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, which I haven't read, nor have I ever seen the stage production. So, perhaps I’m not the target audience for this cinematic endeavor—maybe my opinion is just like those overpriced popcorn boxes: it doesn’t really matter, but I’m going to share it anyway.
After debuting at the top of the global box office with a whopping $223 million—making it the biggest opening ever for a Broadway musical adaptation—WICKED: FOR GOOD has unfortunately underperformed overall, raking in $200 million less than its predecessor. It's now available to buy (or more appropriately, lease) or rent on digital platforms starting December 30, courtesy of Universal Pictures Home Entertainment. With a commendable “A” Cinemascore and an audience score of 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, it’s heralded as “a sensational conclusion” by Mashable. But I find it hard to see how.
In WICKED: FOR GOOD, Elphaba and Glinda find themselves on opposing shores, adrift in the turbulent waters of their choices. Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo), once a misunderstood sorceress, is now branded as the Wicked Witch of the West, living in the shadows of her exile. Her mission to expose the duplicitous nature of The Wizard drives her deeper into the margins of Oz.


